Teaser

Cyberspace, body augmentation, spaceflight. Technology has wrought many changes on the world, but one thing that remains the same is human fallibility. There is still greed, still violence, and still crime . . .

Review

Some books leave a legacy that shapes the genre. Frank Herbert’s Dune, for example, fundamentally rewrote the expectations of space opera. Robert Heinlein’s Starship Troopers set a new standard for military SF. These books cast a long shadow across the science fiction that follows in their footsteps. William Gibson’s Neuromancer is one such book. Without it, we would still have cyberpunk, but it would be a markedly different genre.

I’ll be upfront, and admit that I don’t particularly care for cyberpunk. I enjoyed the first Matrix film, and the Deus Ex computer game series is a favourite of mine, but as a whole, cyberpunk fails to thrill me. It’s all very stylised, very edgy, and maybe comes across as too try-hard. The technology employed is curiously analogue for the future it projects, and the fetishisation of Japanese culture is startlingly prevalent. Thus, properties such as Altered Carbon and Cyberpunk 2077 feel as though they’re evoking an outdated view of the future. Which makes sense, because what they’re doing is putting a new spin on an old idea. William Gibson’s idea.

Neuromancer deserves its place as a cornerstone of cyberpunk. Even forty years later, its fingerprints are all over the genre. The problem I have is that the genre it represents is a mixed bag at best, and Neuromancer is filled to the gills with the genre’s worst excesses. I don’t have a problem with a book doing things for shock value. Shock, like any other reaction, is perfectly valid for a book to create in the reader. Yet Neuromancer is a chain of shocks. One after another, until there is nothing else. Like jump scares in a horror film, they quickly lose impact.

The cyber aspects of the novel are its strength. It’s incredibly easy to draw lines from Gibson’s imagination to every cyberpunk novel that followed. Virtual realities. Body modification. Computer viruses. It’s all here. What drags the book down is the punk. Like so much of the musical punk genre, Neuromancer is so focused on breaking the mould and rebelling, it forgets to create anything interesting amid the ruins. So it is that we have a deluge of sex, drugs, and violent rock and roll. All thrown at the page with nothing sticking in the imagination. It is, as a far greater writer once said, sound and fury, signifying nothing.

This would have been a much tougher read to finish were it not for the audiobook. There are a few versions out there, but the Jason Flemyng edition is the version I recommend if you’re Neuromancer-inclined. UK science fction fans might recognise Flemyng from time-travel drama Primeval, which is where I first knew of him, but he crops up in supporting roles all over the place. This is hardly surprising, as his versatility is on full display in Neuromancer. Every character has a unique voice, and the narration is far clearer than the words alone would lead you think.

Neuromancer was a buddy read of this year’s #SciFiMonth, and having people to bounce around discussion with made the listening experience all the better. Especially with a book as historically significant as this one. Ultimately, I do place Neuromancer alongside Dune. A book that is better for what it inspired than for what it is in its own terms.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

Audio Stats

  • Narrated by Jason Flemyng
  • Sprawl Trilogy #1
  • First Published 1984
  • Runtime 8hrs 32 mins

7 responses to “BOOK REVIEW: Neuromancer, by William Gibson”

  1. spalanz Avatar

    Great review! I read this for the first time this year, amid a resurgence of my interest in the Android Netrunner card game. I loved it at the time, seeing the mechanics of the card game play themselves out on the page. But ultimately, cyberpunk is definitely a curious genre, especially 40 years on. I suppose it’s a book best enjoyed as a historical thing, for starting off something else?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. imyril @ There's Always Room For One More Avatar

    That’s a very good assessment / apt comparison. I don’t much enjoy Dune either and for much the same reasons. Thanks for reading this with us – the group discussion definitely helped keep

    me going.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Nic Avatar

    I’ve never been interested in reading this book. I was pretty sure it wasn’t for me. This review confirms it.
    I’m glad the audio and the buddy read made it a better experience for you

    Liked by 1 person

  4. James Farson Avatar

    It’s one of those books that I bet was electric at the time but has become such a part of the background energy that it’s hard to read it now and feel the same spark. I read it like it was a Raymond Chandler with a very particular aesthetic and enjoyed it on those terms. I must admit I have much hazier memories of the other sprawl novels but remember very much enjoying Burning Chrome.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. WordsAndPeace Avatar

    “A book that is better for what it inspired than for what it is in its own terms.” Amen to this!
    In fact, I had to DNF it. Maybe I should try to listen to it?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Alex Hormann Avatar

    If you DNF’d the physical, I don’t think you’d enjoy the audio that much more. The writing is still as clumsy when spoken aloud, though the dialogue is better
    .

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Austin Bond Avatar
    Austin Bond

    love this book, read it a few years ago – it’s such an original and captivating plot about AI wanting to break free…

    Like

Leave a comment